Hello! The Puerto Rican Rails Dude is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- www.dennmart.com Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Good evening sir. Is this really stalkerish?
- i get info about fatten up those error pages for internet explorer 6.0.. thank you. ______________________________________________________________________ Alex
- Arg, thanks for figuring this out!
- Furthermore, it's useful to take in mind that Google doesn't like sites concerned to porno, so it may result getting some filters... Your blog is interesting with no porn. :)
- Thank for post. Also you can always ask me!
Jump to original thread »
I remember when I first started using Linux back in the day - “back in the day” referring to about the year 2000 - it was a total pain to work with. From not-so-great hardware detection, to installation and partitioning pains, to the ever-lasting fight against making a Wi
... Continue reading »
2 years ago
While I don't typically compile my software to optimize performance on my system and I'm quick to sacrifice the latest version for an easy install, I can see the value of doing this. But no need to sacrifice a package manager for compiling if the srpm's are available. Also, I've found that software configuration and/or placement in the system is much more problematic in packages than compilation options or any other compile-time decisions. Ultimately, the package is only as good as the packager has made it- lots of packages just aren't quality efforts.